Retire Early Lifestyle
Retirement; like your parents, but way cooler

In 1991 Billy and Akaisha Kaderli retired at the age of 38. Now, into their 4th decade of this financially independent lifestyle, they invite you to take advantage of their wisdom and experience.

Lance Roberts Market Report

The short answer appears to be “yes.” However, it seems to be narrower, later, and more fragile than the headline mythology suggests. Importantly, the official “Santa Claus rally” window has not even started yet, as it is statistically measured as the last five trading days of the year plus the first two of January. Historically, that seven-session stretch has produced an average gain of about 1.3% and finishes positive “nearly 80% of the time,” according to data analysis from the long-running Stock Trader’s Almanac.

However, given the recent sloppy and weak trading in the market, it is unsurprising that investors are questioning whether “Santa Will Visit Broad & Wall” this year. So, don’t give up hope just yet that investors’ stockings will be filled with Christmas cheer. According to Goldman Sachs, absent anything actively bad, stocks seem to drift upward for a variety of reasons such as year-end window dressing, share buybacks, and performance chasing. However, a rosier 2026 economy, deregulation, AI, and the fundamental premise that corporate stories will improve are also tailwinds.

“Barring any major shocks, it will be hard to fight the overwhelmingly positive seasonal period we are entering and the cleaner positioning set-up,” Goldman’s Gail Hafif

Currently, what matters is whether the market is positioned to enter the “Santa Rally” window with sufficient internal support to sustain a year-end bid. After a weak and volatile first half of December, price action improved as the week drew to a close, with both employment and inflation reports supporting further Fed rate-cutting policies. U.S. equities rebounded on renewed strength in mega-cap/AI leadership, following the UAE’s commitment of $100 billion. According to the WSJ, OpenAI aims to raise as much as $100 billion from sovereign-wealth funds. Given that the UAE was a previous investor, it now has little choice other than to continue funding further commitments.

Furthermore, Reuters captured the tone shift succinctly: “we’re beginning to see some stabilization… for the Christmas year-end rally to resume,” noting that tech had been under pressure before the bounce.

However, “intact” does not mean “easy.”

First, breadth is not uniform, and conviction remains selective. Schwab described the market’s posture as “selective, rather than broad,” while noting roughly 56% of S&P 500 stocks were above their 50-day moving averages. That is a healthy level, but not the kind of participation that makes rallies durable without interruption.

Secondly, sentiment is elevated, and positioning risk is creeping back in. As shown, the National Association of Investment Managers Index surged to levels that have usually preceded pullbacks. However, that does not negate Santa seasonality; it does, however, raise the odds that any rally could be short-lived in January.

Bottom line: The Santa Rally remains viable because the overall trend remains constructive and liquidity expectations are supportive. However, the market is also priced for good news. In such an environment, the rally likely depends on continued stabilization in leadership, contained yields, and no surprise shocks that force de-risking into thin holiday liquidity.

Which brings us to the market.

📈Technical Backdrop – Market Rallies As Expected

Following a 4-day “sell off” into mid-week, which broke both supports at the 20- and 50-day moving averages, investors mustered the courage to once again “buy the dip,” reversing early-week losses and pushing the market to 6,835 on Friday. That recovery keeps the broader uptrend intact, but the market is now pressing directly into a zone where prior momentum stalled, making the next week critical for determining whether the year-end advance can extend.

From a trend perspective, the index finished the week above its 20- and 50-day moving averages, confirming that sellers failed to regain control after the post-FOMC volatility. However, upside progress has repeatedly stalled at the 6,900 resistance level, which coincides with prior highs and the upper boundary of the near-term consolidation range. Until price can close decisively above that level, upside should be viewed as incremental rather than impulsive. Historically, failed breakouts near year-end often lead to short, sharp retracements rather than prolonged declines, particularly when liquidity thins into the holidays.

Momentum indicators are consistent with that interpretation. Relative strength has improved from the oversold conditions of early December, but is now approaching levels where rallies have stalled. Furthermore, the negative divergence of relative strength since September suggests an increasing fragility to market rallies. Notably, volatility has decreased, with the VIX falling back into the mid-teens, suggesting that complacency is returning. While low volatility often supports higher prices, it also leaves markets vulnerable to abrupt price declines if expectations are not met.

Key Support and Resistance Levels

Looking into next week and the remainder of the year, support levels are clearly defined and relatively close to current prices. A pullback toward initial support would be technically normal and even constructive if buyers step in near the trend. Conversely, a failure to hold intermediate support would raise the risk that investors once again receive a “lump of coal” for Christmas.

In summary, the technical backdrop suggests that the market remains positioned for a year-end advance, provided bulls can defend near-term support and eventually reclaim the overhead resistance. Without a breakout, the most likely outcome is continued consolidation, accompanied by increased volatility, as investors adjust their positions ahead of year-end.

🔑 Key Catalysts Next Week

As the market enters the final week of regular trading before year-end, the calendar shifts from heavier macro releases to a mix of critical economic data, light earnings, and holiday-impacted sessions. With major U.S. stock exchanges remaining open through December 26 (including trading on December 24 with an early close and a full session on December 26), positioning will increasingly reflect seasonal flows as well as reactions to late-cycle indicators that can impact rate expectations and risk appetite. Markets continue to digest recent economic developments amid ongoing uncertainty about rates and inflation, meaning that even a limited slate of catalysts can trigger outsized reactions.

The economic docket for the week is anchored by key inflation and spending releases that feed directly into the Fed’s policy framework. The Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index, the Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation gauge, is scheduled for Monday and will be one of the most closely watched data points of the entire week, given its potential influence on expectations for 2026 monetary policy. Alongside that, personal spending and the broader PCE measure will provide insights into consumer demand at the close of 2025. Outside of macroeconomic activity, earnings are light due to the proximity of year-end; institutional and retail focus will likely shift toward any surprises in the few reported results, as well as guidance, with notable corporations historically scheduled earlier in the month having already reported.

In conclusion, while next week’s catalyst list is lighter than typical “earnings-heavy” periods, the scheduled economic releases, especially inflation measures, carry asymmetric risk for equities. Combined with compressed liquidity into the holidays, the market could exhibit heightened sensitivity to even modest deviations from expectations, guiding positioning into year-end and the “Santa Rally” window.

💰 Fed’s Soft Landing Talk Meets Hard Data

The Fed’s soft landing narrative is a key theme in financial media, particularly on Wall Street, which expects a resurgence in economic activity in 2026 to justify increasing forward earnings expectations.

As shown, Wall Street currently expects the bottom 493 stocks to contribute more to earnings in 2026 than they have in the past 3 years. This is notable in that, over the past three years, the average growth rate for the bottom 493 stocks was less than 3%. Yet over the next 2 years, that earnings growth is expected to average above 11%.

Furthermore, the outlook is even more exuberant for the most economically sensitive stocks. Small and mid-cap companies struggled to produce earnings growth during the previous three years of robust economic growth, driven by monetary and fiscal stimulus. However, next year, even if the Fed’s soft landing narrative is valid, they are expected to see a surge in earnings growth rates of nearly 60%.

Notably, all this is occurring at a time when the entire economy’s profit margins have peaked and may potentially be turning lower.

It should come as no surprise that there is a high correlation between economic growth and earnings, given that in a demand-driven economy, consumption is what generates revenues, and revenues ultimately develop earnings.

“A better way to visualize this data is to look at the correlation between the annual change in earnings growth and inflation-adjusted GDP. There are periods when earnings deviate from underlying economic activity. However, those periods are due to pre- or post-recession earnings fluctuations. Currently, economic and earnings growth are very close to the long-term correlation.”

The problem currently facing the Fed’s soft landing narrative is that it hopes the economy can slow without a recession, allowing inflation to return to its target. For now, investors have held the markets higher, hoping the Fed’s soft landing narrative comes to fruition, which would lead to a surge in economic activity. However, the latest employment, retail sales, and inflation trends suggest a potentially worse outcome, characterized by weakening demand and shaky consumer strength.

Those factors weaken the case for the Fed’s hopes of a soft landing and suggest an increase in market fragility.

Falling Inflation Tells a Demand Story

Let’s start with inflation. If economic growth were on the cusp of resurgence, expectations for inflation would be rising. However, as shown, those expectations never rose with “printed inflation,” because it was the “transitory effect” of massive monetary stimulus. The bond market’s view was that inflation would revert to its normalized levels as that monetary excess left the system, which has been the case. This is particularly notable, as inflation expectations have always been more accurate than the “inflation” bears we discussed yesterday.

In the Fed’s narrative of a soft landing, the trend in inflation expectations is crucial. Here is an essential point:

“The Federal Reserve WANTS inflation.”

Here is another critical point: So do you.

Without inflation, there can not be economic growth, increasing wages, and an improving standard of living. In other words, prices must always rise over time, which is why the Fed targets a 2% inflation rate, thereby supporting 2% economic growth. What we don’t want is “disinflation” or “deflation,” which would occur in conjunction with a recession, leading to job losses, falling wages, and reduced prosperity overall. As shown in the chart below, there is a high correlation between inflation, economic growth, and interest rates over time.

When inflation eases because demand weakens, the economy slows, producers lower prices to clear unsold goods, and employers become more restrictive in hiring and wage increases. Services that rely on discretionary spending lose pricing power, and banks become more stringent in their lending practices. These are not signs of a healthy expansion, but rather reflect a decline in spending power among households.

The Fed’s soft landing narrative is predicated on the hope that it can achieve its 2% inflation target without causing a more widespread slowdown. Historically, the Fed has failed in such attempts, as shown by the relationship between Fed rate-cutting cycles and economic and financial consequences.

As an investor, you need to distinguish between inflation caused by temporary supply/demand shocks, as we saw following the Pandemic, and inflation caused by organic economic activity. Supply/demand imbalances, such as higher input costs or a lack of supply caused by a geopolitical shock, can create a spike in inflation, which resolves itself when the shock is over. However, inflation caused by organic demand provides insight into the strength or weakness of the economy. Currently, we are focused on potential demand erosion as consumers cut back, employment weakens, and wages decline.

The retail sector provides early signals of demand weakness. Housing-related spending, auto sales, and discretionary purchases show stress, and many consumers face higher borrowing costs and lower savings. As shown, PCE, which accounts for nearly 70% of the GDP calculation, slowing inflation rates, and weak retail sales growth, all suggest that demand destruction is present in the economy. Such a development may further weigh on the Fed’s narrative of a soft landing.

As noted, the Fed’s soft landing narrative requires demand to slow moderately while avoiding recession. However, falling inflation driven by weakening demand and sluggish employment growth suggests a more profound weakness.

Retail Sales Growth Is Not What It Appears

Headline retail sales reports often show month-over-month increases, which reporters interpret as evidence of resilient consumer strength. However, a look at the data tells a different story. For example, since 2022, real retail sales growth has effectively not grown. In fact, previous periods of flat retail sales growth were pre-recessionary warnings.

Secondly, the annual rate of change in real retail sales is at levels that have typically preceded weaker economic environments and recessions.

Notably, retail sales figures are subject to seasonal adjustments, which correct for typical spending patterns. During the holiday and back-to-school seasons, spending increases and the “adjustments” attempt to remove these effects. However, if the adjustment process overestimates normal seasonal strength, the adjusted result will appear firmer than it actually is. Secondly, another distortion comes from changes in price levels. If prices fall because demand weakens, nominal sales may rise while real volumes fall. Consumers buy less but pay lower prices. Nominal retail sales can mislead when viewed without context.

This is what we are currently seeing in the economy. As consumers pull back, businesses face the prospect of weaker revenue. That leads to slower hiring, lower investment, and falling confidence.

This matters for the Fed’s view of a soft landing. If consumer demand remains weak, the economy may slow more than expected, which increases the risk of recession. A “soft landing” requires growth to slow without tipping over, but current economic data points suggest a risk to that growth story.

The Market Risk If The Fed Is Wrong

If the Fed’s soft landing narrative proves incorrect, the downside risk to investors increases significantly. The soft landing narrative has been factored into market prices, earnings expectations, and economic projections. Any deviation exposes valuations and portfolios to sharp repricing. With valuations already very elevated, the risk of a repricing event is not insignificant.

Wall Street’s forward expectations hinge on a growth rebound in 2026. Those projections assume that demand will return and margins will remain stable. However, there is no guarantee that either of those assumptions are accurate. If margins have already peaked, inflation declines as demand erodes, and employment falls, negative earnings revisions could be substantial. The year-over-year change in real retail sales, as shown in the chart, has hovered near recessionary warning levels. With consumers already strained by high debt service costs, weak wage growth, and declining savings, discretionary spending is under pressure, which directly affects earnings across cyclical sectors.

If demand weakens further, companies will face lower revenue and tighter margins. The margin compression will initially impact earnings, particularly for smaller firms with limited pricing power. A repricing of earnings expectations will follow, dragging valuations with it.

The Fed’s historical track record of avoiding recession during tightening and easing cycles is poor. Most rate-cutting cycles have been in response to financial or economic stress, not smooth slowdowns. If the Fed cuts rates next year, it likely won’t be in response to a soft landing. That shift in narrative would catch most investors leaning the wrong way.

Positioning for a soft landing assumes the Fed can control inflation without breaking demand. The data say otherwise. The risk, as always, is that the market wakes up to this reality too late. Therefore, investors should consider preparing for such a possibility in advance.